CFPB expands oversight of digital payments services including Apple Pay and Cash App
Yes, there has been some debate in recent times regarding the traditional garb worn by barristers and judges in the courtrooms of England and Wales. The full-bottomed wig, along with other elements of formal courtroom attire, has been a staple of English legal practice for centuries, but in recent years, there have been calls to abandon this tradition for various reasons, including suggestions of cultural insensitivity.
The debate primarily centres around whether the wigs and gowns may seem out of touch or alienating to people from culturally diverse backgrounds. Some argue that the mandatory formal wear could be seen as a symbol of cultural hierarchy and elitism.
On the other hand, proponents of the wig and gown tradition argue that they serve an important purpose beyond mere adherence to tradition, such as maintaining a sense of formality and decorum in the courtroom, symbolizing the impartiality of the law, and providing a level of anonymity for legal professionals.
It ultimately lies in the hands of the Judiciary and the Bar’s regulatory bodies to decide whether they will maintain, adapt or abandon these sartorial traditions in response to the changing cultural landscape.
