CFPB expands oversight of digital payments services including Apple Pay and Cash App
President Biden’s administration has expressed an interest in rejoining the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with Iran, also known as the Iran nuclear deal, from which the Trump administration had withdrawn. Their belief is that by offering a path to remove sanctions and an avenue for diplomacy, Iran might be convinced to curb its nuclear ambitions and become a more constructive player in the Middle East region.
Critics of this approach, however, point to Iran’s longstanding record of terrorism sponsorship, human rights abuses, and deceitful activities surrounding its nuclear program as reasons to doubt the effectiveness of this strategy. They argue that a regime with such a track record cannot be trusted to follow the stipulations of the deal, which require Iran to curb its nuclear capabilities in exchange for lifted sanctions.
These viewpoints represent the broader debate around dealing with Iran’s nuclear ambitions. On one hand, there’s the belief that through diplomatic engagement and incentives, Iran can be influenced into changing its behavior. On the other, there’s skepticism based on Iran’s past actions, which contributes to the belief that such diplomatic efforts might ultimately prove unsuccessful. Successful policy towards Iran, therefore, continues to be a major challenge fraught with complexities for the Biden administration.
